According to some people, the world chess champion became a champion not because he studied theory, trained and prepared for tournaments, but because he had the chess gene or the winner’s gene. Of course, they will correct me and still say absolutely unscientific nonsense from the category “genes gave a tendency to certain things”, but to which ones? The ability to count to four, maximum five: “I have three attacks on the pawn, and the opponent has two pieces that protect it, but on the next move he will be able to bring the rook to defense right in front of my queen, so attacking is not an option for now…”. Okay, that’s chess, but what about other areas? What gene, according to these gene fuckers, is necessary to successfully read documentation for programming languages or scientific books? The reader gene or a genetic predisposition to something that implies the presence of a brain?

I hear this nonsense very often from people of the past generation, maybe it is connected with the fact that in those days information was not as accessible as it is now, but it is the philosophy of losers and nonentities who justify themselves by the good genetics of those who actually just worked and nothing prevented them from doing the same. I have never heard from any champion or professional that it is necessary to be born with good genetics in order to achieve success in this or that business, because this would mean absolute disrespect for one’s own work and time, thanks to which success was achieved. Therefore, even if we hypothetically assume that there are so-called “success genes”, then those who possess them will never mention them, so in the opinion of gene fuckers, they themselves are losers.

In conclusion, I just want to draw the line: geniuses or super genes do not exist, behind everything there is an ordinary thirst for self-improvement and this is a healthy philosophy that makes people stronger, and genetic heresy leads to nothing but racism, fascism and degradation.